“Safe and effective” are words repeated over and over in our mainstream media when discussing the COVID-19 injections. This phrase has been used like a mantra washing repetitively over our collective brains to convince people that the essentially experimental mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations are indeed “safe and effective”, but are they?
The facts seen unfolding in the scientific literature actually indicate that none of the COVID vaccines are especially safe or effective. Also, the science being pushed by the mainstream media is incomplete and often downright skewed toward pushing universal vaccination as the only response to COVID-19 and its variants.
More Scientific Transparency is Needed for COVID Vaccine Trials
More scientific transparency when it comes to the COVID vaccine trials is desperately needed. This means the public deserves clear, accurate, and complete reporting of all components of the relevant scientific research. Such transparency generally includes openly reporting the following for a study: (1) participant characteristics; (2) how participants were identified, screened and recruited, (3) what criteria was used to include or exclude participants; (4) how and when participants were tested, observed or measured; (5) what equipment, apparatus or instruments were employed in the study; (6) what transformations the measures or observations underwent; and (7) what material and financial resources from what sources were used to support the research. Well-respected and widely published medical doctors and researchers like Dr Robert W. Malone, who pioneered the mRNA vaccine technology, are also becoming concerned with transparency and safety in response to the COVID pandemic. The FDA Wants to Take 75 Years to Release Pfizer Clinical Testing Data Shockingly, the FDA actually asked that a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request submitted to its office concerning Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine's clinical trials not be promptly satisfied, instead stating that it needed up to 55 years to complete the disclosure of these key documents. The FDA later changed its request to 75 years. This is clearly an excessive amount of time to provide a scientifically transparent response, especially when the FDA apparently only needed 108 days to read those clinical trial documents in order to approve the vaccine initially. Such a highly suspicious delay also calls into question whether anyone can actually give their “informed consent” to the Pfizer or other COVID-19 vaccines since their trial data has been effectively covered up for a very long period of time.
To address this notable transparency issue and request a timelier response from Pfizer regarding its clinical trials, the complaint in Case 4:21-cv-01058-P was filed on September 16, 2021 in the U.S. District Court Northern District of Texas. The complaint listed the Plaintiff as the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, while the Defendant is the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
That 37-page legal document demanding scientific transparency is viewable here. It presents an excellent case for seeking improvement to disclose about COVID-19 vaccine trials so that individuals can make a more informed vaccination decision for themselves and their children. Asking Questions Makes Sense, Even During a Pandemic
Taking into account the lack of scientific transparency and the censorship within the medical community and the media and pharmaceutical companies' conflicting interests with the general public, and the rather low risk of getting a deadly case of COVID-19, some questions may naturally arise in a rational person's mind.
For example:
· Given low official risk estimates, why is such a huge fuss being made about this particular disease that apparently justifies disrupting the economy, mandating invasive medical procedures, restricting travel and social activities, and removing cherished civil liberties?
· Was the initially-advised COVID-19 treatment protocol mistaken and is it still?
· Could those who died have been saved with inexpensive early onset treatments?
· Does it really make sense to risk further mistakes by widely rolling out and promoting insufficiently-tested vaccines and booster shots that could cause more harm than good?
Above all, as we move into the year 2022, please keep asking such sensible questions, researching the facts to your satisfaction based on reputable sources, and standing up for your rights and medical freedom. If you would like to show support for Medical Freedom in Lake County, please sign this online petition at Change.org.
コメント